OpenClaw Sub-Agents: How to Run Parallel AI Workflows
Stop doing things one at a time. Sub-agents let your OpenClaw run multiple tasks simultaneously—here's how they work.
#OpenClaw Sub-Agents: How to Run Parallel AI Workflows
What if your AI agent could clone itself?
That's essentially what sub-agents do. Instead of handling one task at a time, OpenClaw can spawn multiple agents to work in parallel—then combine their results.
#The Problem: Sequential Bottlenecks
Without sub-agents, your agent works like this:
- Research competitor A → 5 minutes
- Research competitor B → 5 minutes
- Research competitor C → 5 minutes
- Compare all three → 3 minutes
Total: 18 minutes
With sub-agents:
- Research A, B, and C simultaneously → 5 minutes
- Compare all three → 3 minutes
Total: 8 minutes
That's a 55% reduction. And the savings scale with task complexity.
#How Sub-Agents Work
Your main agent acts as an orchestrator. It:
- Decomposes a complex task into smaller pieces
- Spawns sub-agents to handle each piece
- Monitors their progress
- Combines their results into a final output
Each sub-agent runs in its own isolated session with its own context and model.
Want step-by-step guides for this and more?
ClawDocx Pro includes 500+ curated prompts, setup guides, SKILL.md files, and templates — everything to make your AI agent unstoppable.
See plans & pricing#Real Example: Parallel Code Review
Say you want a thorough PR review. Instead of one agent checking everything sequentially, spawn four specialists:
- Security Agent: Check for vulnerabilities, injection risks, secrets
- Performance Agent: Look for N+1 queries, missing indexes, bottlenecks
- Style Agent: Naming conventions, code organization, readability
- Test Agent: Coverage gaps, edge cases, missing assertions
Each runs for 2 minutes. You get a comprehensive review in 2 minutes instead of 8.
#When to Use Sub-Agents
Great for:
- Research across multiple sources
- Code review (security, performance, style in parallel)
- Bulk content generation
- Multi-step analysis with independent steps
- Competitive analysis
Not worth it for:
- Simple questions
- Tasks that need sequential context
- Quick one-off requests
- When budget is very tight
#Cost Considerations
Sub-agents multiply your API usage. Smart model selection keeps costs down:
| Task Type | Recommended Model | Cost/Task |
|---|---|---|
| Research | Sonnet 4.6 | ~$0.15 |
| Coding | GPT-5.3-Codex | ~$0.25 |
| Summarization | Haiku 4 | ~$0.03 |
| Complex reasoning | Opus 4.6 | ~$0.75 |
Rule of thumb: Use the cheapest model that can handle the task. Haiku 4 for summaries, Sonnet 4.6 for most work, Opus 4.6 only for complex reasoning.
#Getting Started
The simplest sub-agent spawn:
"Break this research into 3 parallel tasks and use sub-agents to research them simultaneously."OpenClaw handles the rest—spawning agents, monitoring progress, and combining results.
For more control, you can specify models, timeouts, and cleanup strategies in your prompts.
#What's Next?
Sub-agents are one of OpenClaw's most powerful features, but they take practice to use effectively. Common mistakes include over-parallelizing (spawning too many agents) and using expensive models for simple tasks.
Want the complete playbook? Our premium Sub-Agents Mastery guide covers fan-out patterns, error handling, cost optimization, and 5 real-world workflow templates you can copy today.
What would you parallelize first?