Back to Blog

OpenClaw Sub-Agents: How to Run Parallel AI Workflows

Stop doing things one at a time. Sub-agents let your OpenClaw run multiple tasks simultaneously—here's how they work.

Sam Okafor2 min read

#OpenClaw Sub-Agents: How to Run Parallel AI Workflows

What if your AI agent could clone itself?

That's essentially what sub-agents do. Instead of handling one task at a time, OpenClaw can spawn multiple agents to work in parallel—then combine their results.

#The Problem: Sequential Bottlenecks

Without sub-agents, your agent works like this:

  1. Research competitor A → 5 minutes
  2. Research competitor B → 5 minutes
  3. Research competitor C → 5 minutes
  4. Compare all three → 3 minutes

Total: 18 minutes

With sub-agents:

  1. Research A, B, and C simultaneously → 5 minutes
  2. Compare all three → 3 minutes

Total: 8 minutes

That's a 55% reduction. And the savings scale with task complexity.

#How Sub-Agents Work

Your main agent acts as an orchestrator. It:

  1. Decomposes a complex task into smaller pieces
  2. Spawns sub-agents to handle each piece
  3. Monitors their progress
  4. Combines their results into a final output

Each sub-agent runs in its own isolated session with its own context and model.

Want step-by-step guides for this and more?

ClawDocx Pro includes 500+ curated prompts, setup guides, SKILL.md files, and templates — everything to make your AI agent unstoppable.

See plans & pricing

#Real Example: Parallel Code Review

Say you want a thorough PR review. Instead of one agent checking everything sequentially, spawn four specialists:

  • Security Agent: Check for vulnerabilities, injection risks, secrets
  • Performance Agent: Look for N+1 queries, missing indexes, bottlenecks
  • Style Agent: Naming conventions, code organization, readability
  • Test Agent: Coverage gaps, edge cases, missing assertions

Each runs for 2 minutes. You get a comprehensive review in 2 minutes instead of 8.

#When to Use Sub-Agents

Great for:

  • Research across multiple sources
  • Code review (security, performance, style in parallel)
  • Bulk content generation
  • Multi-step analysis with independent steps
  • Competitive analysis

Not worth it for:

  • Simple questions
  • Tasks that need sequential context
  • Quick one-off requests
  • When budget is very tight

#Cost Considerations

Sub-agents multiply your API usage. Smart model selection keeps costs down:

Task TypeRecommended ModelCost/Task
ResearchSonnet 4.6~$0.15
CodingGPT-5.3-Codex~$0.25
SummarizationHaiku 4~$0.03
Complex reasoningOpus 4.6~$0.75

Rule of thumb: Use the cheapest model that can handle the task. Haiku 4 for summaries, Sonnet 4.6 for most work, Opus 4.6 only for complex reasoning.

#Getting Started

The simplest sub-agent spawn:

"Break this research into 3 parallel tasks and use sub-agents to research them simultaneously."

OpenClaw handles the rest—spawning agents, monitoring progress, and combining results.

For more control, you can specify models, timeouts, and cleanup strategies in your prompts.

#What's Next?

Sub-agents are one of OpenClaw's most powerful features, but they take practice to use effectively. Common mistakes include over-parallelizing (spawning too many agents) and using expensive models for simple tasks.

Want the complete playbook? Our premium Sub-Agents Mastery guide covers fan-out patterns, error handling, cost optimization, and 5 real-world workflow templates you can copy today.


What would you parallelize first?

Get the full experience with ClawDocx Pro

Access 500+ prompts, step-by-step guides, SKILL.md files, and more. Everything you need to master OpenClaw.

Start Free Trial

Related Posts